[Sep 17, 2026] New Real C_DBADM_2601 Exam Dumps Questions [Q71-Q95]

Q71. CHALLENGE 3 – Cloud Transition Evidence Boundary
The modernization lead wants the SAP HANA Cloud database included in the same readiness status as the remediation systems because it is provisioned and has a limited reporting dataset. The cloud environment has not completed the startup, monitoring, or recovery evidence package used for the template release. What is the best response?

Q72. CHALLENGE 4 – Release Recoverability Evidence Gate
The upgraded reporting system has recent backup completion evidence but no current recovery validation record. The newly installed UAT database has a recovery test scheduled before sign-off. Which interpretation is most accurate?

Q73. A regional food distribution company performs a recovery readiness exercise for its SAP HANA system before a seasonal ordering peak. The backup catalog shows the latest backup as complete, but the recovery checklist references an older backup point from the previous exercise. The operations team asks whether the exercise can be signed off because the latest backup itself completed successfully.
The constraint is that the recovery readiness record must demonstrate alignment between the selected recovery point, available backup evidence, and the intended exercise objective. The sign-off cannot rely on unrelated historical checklist entries.
Which action should the administrator take?

Q74. A regional consumer packaging company is rehearsing migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The transfer completes, and the cloud target can be queried. During review, the administrator finds that validation results were captured from a temporary administrator account used only for the rehearsal. The planned operations team will use a different cloud administration identity after cutover, and no checks have been run with that identity.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove repeatable post-migration administration, not only successful rehearsal access. The team wants the same validation pattern to be reused for later migration waves.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

Q75. A regional textile manufacturer is rehearsing a phased migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The source export finishes, the cloud target is reachable, and a small validation query succeeds on the target. During the readiness review, the administrator notices that the migration evidence does not include confirmation that the target-side administration user can perform required monitoring and backup review tasks after import. The project sponsor wants approval because the transfer and query were successful.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove operational administration readiness in the cloud target, not only data movement. The rehearsal must remain repeatable for later migration waves.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

Q76. CHALLENGE 2 – Replenishment Analytics Monitoring Baseline
The database team can either tune memory-related settings now to improve evening replenishment analytics or first preserve baseline monitoring evidence and tune only if current evidence supports it. Which option is most defensible?

Q77. A regional office equipment company completes an SAP HANA upgrade rehearsal for an on-premises database. The database starts after the upgrade, and SAP HANA cockpit shows the system as available. During validation, the administrator finds that the operations runbook still references the pre-upgrade administration sequence for start, monitoring, and backup checks. The technical lead wants to approve the rehearsal because the upgraded system is running.
The constraint is that the administrator must ensure the runbook reflects the upgraded lifecycle state before using the rehearsal to approve production execution. The decision must not rely only on successful startup.
What should the administrator do before accepting the rehearsal?

Q78. A regional airport operator maintains SAP HANA for operational analytics while preparing an administration model that covers an on-premises database and an SAP HANA Cloud target. During a readiness review, SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises database is available, while SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms that the cloud target is provisioned. However, the review evidence does not identify which environment owns backup monitoring, daily administration checks, or migration rehearsal validation.
The constraint is that the administrator must prevent unclear operational ownership before the next handover meeting. The team must keep both environments in scope without treating tool visibility as proof that administration responsibilities are correctly assigned.
Which action best addresses the ownership ambiguity?

Q79. A renewable energy company is preparing a phased move from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The first rehearsal transfers a small administrative dataset successfully, and SAP HANA Cloud Central shows the target database as running. During post-migration review, database explorer checks on the target fail because the validation connection still uses the source system entry from the rehearsal workstation. The migration lead wants to approve the phase because the cloud target is active.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate the migrated target without confusing source connectivity with cloud validation. The phased migration should remain repeatable for later datasets.
Which action should the administrator take?

Q80. A regional telecom support center performs a planned parameter adjustment for SAP HANA administration. After the change, SAP HANA starts normally and the database remains available. However, an administrator reviewing active settings notices that the parameter appears in the persisted configuration record but is not reflected in the active runtime state used by current sessions. Routine application checks still succeed, so the service desk wants to close the activity.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove that the approved configuration is active, not only stored. The environment must remain available, and any follow-up action must target the configuration activation gap rather than unrelated application behavior.
Which action best resolves the configuration validation issue?

Q81. A regional paper packaging manufacturer is preparing an SAP HANA upgrade validation for an on-premises administration environment. The upgrade task completed, and SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available. During validation, the administrator finds that the operations note records the new target level, but the lifecycle evidence file still contains the pre-upgrade component reference from the maintenance rehearsal. The plant reporting team asks to release the system because scheduled analytics are running.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove the upgraded lifecycle state before release. The decision cannot depend only on database availability or successful report execution when lifecycle evidence still reflects the earlier state.
Which action best supports release approval?

Q82. A regional vehicle leasing company is updating its SAP HANA administration evidence model for a mixed landscape. The on-premises database supports active reporting, while an SAP HANA Cloud environment is used for migration rehearsal. During review, the administrator finds that the same readiness label is applied to architecture notes, active workload checks, and cloud rehearsal evidence. SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises database is available, and SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms the cloud environment is running.
The constraint is that the administrator must avoid using one readiness label for different architectural responsibilities. The handover must show which evidence belongs to active operation, which belongs to cloud readiness, and which belongs to migration preparation.
Which action best strengthens the administration evidence model?

Q83. A regional pharmacy network runs SAP HANA for internal inventory analytics in an on-premises environment that is administered through mixed tooling. After a planned configuration update, the database starts successfully and SAP HANA cockpit shows the system as available. However, an administrative connection test through hdbsql fails from the operations workstation, while the same user can view the system in the cockpit. The connection entry was recently changed during the maintenance activity.
The constraint is that the administrator must restore validated administrative execution without assuming that cockpit visibility proves command-line connectivity. The operations team needs a confirmed administration path before approving the next scheduled monitoring cycle.
Which action best resolves the administrative validation gap?

Q84. A regional diagnostics provider uses SAP HANA for laboratory operations analytics. The administrator performs a recovery rehearsal in a validation environment. The restore completes, but the validation notes show that the recovery used a backup chain selected from a manually exported catalog snapshot. The live backup catalog contains a newer log entry that was not included in the exported snapshot. The operations manager wants to accept the rehearsal because the database opened successfully.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate recovery using evidence that reflects the current backup catalog. The rehearsal must prove the recoverable state without relying on stale catalog metadata.
What should the administrator do next?

Q85. A regional medical device distributor uses SAP HANA for warranty analytics. After a backup policy adjustment, SAP HANA cockpit shows the latest backup completed successfully. During a recovery readiness review, the administrator finds that the recovery workbook still identifies the previous recovery target point and does not include the latest completed backup in the selection sequence. A reviewer suggests approving the workbook because the backup catalog shows the new backup entry.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove the documented recovery sequence can reach the intended recovery point. Catalog visibility alone is not enough if the workbook still selects an older recovery path.
Which action best supports recovery readiness approval?

Q86. CHALLENGE 4 – Shipping-Cycle Recovery Evidence Gate
The release lead can approve cutover on schedule using backup completion evidence, or delay briefly to include recovery validation for the validation database and recoverability evidence for the upgraded system. Which path is most defensible?

Q87. A regional cold-chain logistics company uses SAP HANA for delivery temperature analytics in an on-premises environment. After a planned database start, SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available. During validation, the administrator notices that an administration setting was updated in the documented configuration sheet, but the active runtime check still shows the previous value. Scheduled monitoring continues to run, so the operations coordinator wants to close the task.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove the configured value is active in runtime before closure. The team must not rely on documentation alone when the observable runtime state still shows a mismatch.
What should the administrator do to resolve the configuration state mismatch?

Q88. CHALLENGE 1 – Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
A database administrator proposes accepting the cutover comparison now and adding a note that one configuration value was documented outside the current record. Which response is most defensible?

Q89. A regional publishing group is preparing an SAP HANA administration runbook for a mixed landscape that includes an on-premises database and an SAP HANA Cloud environment. The draft runbook uses one lifecycle calendar for both environments. During review, the administrator notices that the calendar combines an on-premises upgrade window, SAP HANA Cloud availability checks, and migration rehearsal milestones into one approval step. SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises database is available, and SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms the cloud environment is running.
The constraint is that the runbook must support correct operational decisions for each environment without treating mixed lifecycle evidence as one shared approval state.
Which action best improves the runbook before operational use?

Q90. CHALLENGE 3 – Cloud Migration Readiness Separation
The modernization lead wants the SAP HANA Cloud database included in the same release readiness status because it is provisioned and has a limited activation dataset. The cloud environment has not completed the startup, monitoring, or recovery evidence package used for active UAT systems. What is the best response?

Q91. CHALLENGE 4 – Close Recovery Readiness Gate
The sponsor asks whether the first close package can be approved now because backups completed and reports loaded successfully. The administration lead can either approve now or delay briefly to complete recovery evidence for the systems in scope. Which path is most defensible?

Q92. A regional textile manufacturer is preparing an SAP HANA lifecycle update rehearsal for an on-premises database. The database is available, and the update package has been staged. During the final review, the administrator finds that the rollback checkpoint in the runbook still references the previous rehearsal’s backup timestamp. The current backup completed successfully, but the rollback section was not updated before the approval meeting.
The constraint is that the rehearsal must begin only after rollback evidence matches the current lifecycle activity. The administrator must prevent execution from starting with a recovery reference that belongs to an earlier rehearsal.
What should the administrator do before approving the lifecycle update rehearsal?

Q93. A retail services company runs SAP HANA for internal planning reports in a mixed environment with an on-premises database and administrative tooling used by the database operations team. After a planned operating window, the administrator starts the database and confirms that the host is reachable. However, SAP HANA cockpit still shows one required database service as inactive, and hdbsql connections for routine administrative checks fail for users who depend on that service path.
The constraint is that the administrator must restore normal database operation without treating host reachability as proof that the SAP HANA database stack is fully available. The operations lead also wants validation evidence before reopening the reporting workload.
Which action best addresses the startup inconsistency?

Q94. A regional water services company uses SAP HANA for operational consumption analytics in an on-premises administration environment. After planned maintenance, the database starts and SAP HANA cockpit shows the system as available. During validation, an administrator runs an hdbsql check from the operations workstation and receives a connection response from a different database endpoint than the one recorded in the maintenance plan. The old endpoint was retained in a saved connection profile used by the operations team.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate the intended SAP HANA database before reopening scheduled administration checks. The team must not treat a successful connection as proof that the correct database target was reached.
Which action best resolves the validation issue?

Q95. CHALLENGE 4 – Regional Release Recovery Assurance
The remediation lead can release the regional template on schedule using backup completion evidence, or delay briefly to include recovery validation for the remediation database and recoverability evidence for the upgraded system. Which path is most defensible?